Curve number and runoff calculator
Composite CN from cover type and hydrologic soil group, then TR-55 runoff depth for a 24-hr rainfall.
PRELIMINARYReference tables are still being checked against their printed sources. How results are checked
- Composite CN
- 83.0
- Potential retention S
- 2.05 in
- Initial abstraction Ia
- 0.41 in
- Total area
- 4.00 ac
- CN, subarea 1
- 98
- CN, subarea 2
- 74
The link carries these inputs, not the answer.
Curve numbers by cover and soil group
The TR-55 rows the calculator looks CN up from, for average runoff condition and Ia = 0.2S. A dash means the table prints no value for that soil group.
Table 2-2a: Fully developed urban areas (18 rows)
| Cover | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.), Poor condition (grass cover < 50%) | 68 | 79 | 86 | 89 |
| Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.), Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%) | 49 | 69 | 79 | 84 |
| Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.), Good condition (grass cover > 75%) | 39 | 61 | 74 | 80 |
| Impervious areas: Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right-of-way) | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
| Streets and roads: Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right-of-way) | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
| Streets and roads: Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) | 83 | 89 | 92 | 93 |
| Streets and roads: Gravel (including right-of-way) | 76 | 85 | 89 | 91 |
| Streets and roads: Dirt (including right-of-way) | 72 | 82 | 87 | 89 |
| Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only) | 63 | 77 | 85 | 88 |
| Western desert urban areas: Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders) | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 |
| Urban districts: Commercial and business | 89 | 92 | 94 | 95 |
| Urban districts: Industrial | 81 | 88 | 91 | 93 |
| Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less (town houses) | 77 | 85 | 90 | 92 |
| Residential districts by average lot size: 1/4 acre | 61 | 75 | 83 | 87 |
| Residential districts by average lot size: 1/3 acre | 57 | 72 | 81 | 86 |
| Residential districts by average lot size: 1/2 acre | 54 | 70 | 80 | 85 |
| Residential districts by average lot size: 1 acre | 51 | 68 | 79 | 84 |
| Residential districts by average lot size: 2 acres | 46 | 65 | 77 | 82 |
Table 2-2a: Developing urban areas (1 rows)
| Cover | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) | 77 | 86 | 91 | 94 |
Table 2-2b: Runoff curve numbers for cultivated agricultural lands (33 rows)
| Cover | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fallow, Bare soil | 77 | 86 | 91 | 94 |
| Fallow, Crop residue cover (CR), Poor | 76 | 85 | 90 | 93 |
| Fallow, Crop residue cover (CR), Good | 74 | 83 | 88 | 90 |
| Row crops, Straight row (SR), Poor | 72 | 81 | 88 | 91 |
| Row crops, Straight row (SR), Good | 67 | 78 | 85 | 89 |
| Row crops, SR + CR, Poor | 71 | 80 | 87 | 90 |
| Row crops, SR + CR, Good | 64 | 75 | 82 | 85 |
| Row crops, Contoured (C), Poor | 70 | 79 | 84 | 88 |
| Row crops, Contoured (C), Good | 65 | 75 | 82 | 86 |
| Row crops, C + CR, Poor | 69 | 78 | 83 | 87 |
| Row crops, C + CR, Good | 64 | 74 | 81 | 85 |
| Row crops, Contoured & terraced (C&T), Poor | 66 | 74 | 80 | 82 |
| Row crops, Contoured & terraced (C&T), Good | 62 | 71 | 78 | 81 |
| Row crops, C&T + CR, Poor | 65 | 73 | 79 | 81 |
| Row crops, C&T + CR, Good | 61 | 70 | 77 | 80 |
| Small grain, SR, Poor | 65 | 76 | 84 | 88 |
| Small grain, SR, Good | 63 | 75 | 83 | 87 |
| Small grain, SR + CR, Poor | 64 | 75 | 83 | 86 |
| Small grain, SR + CR, Good | 60 | 72 | 80 | 84 |
| Small grain, C, Poor | 63 | 74 | 82 | 85 |
| Small grain, C, Good | 61 | 73 | 81 | 84 |
| Small grain, C + CR, Poor | 62 | 73 | 81 | 84 |
| Small grain, C + CR, Good | 60 | 72 | 80 | 83 |
| Small grain, C&T, Poor | 61 | 72 | 79 | 82 |
| Small grain, C&T, Good | 59 | 70 | 78 | 81 |
| Small grain, C&T + CR, Poor | 60 | 71 | 78 | 81 |
| Small grain, C&T + CR, Good | 58 | 69 | 77 | 80 |
| Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow, SR, Poor | 66 | 77 | 85 | 89 |
| Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow, SR, Good | 58 | 72 | 81 | 85 |
| Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow, C, Poor | 64 | 75 | 83 | 85 |
| Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow, C, Good | 55 | 69 | 78 | 83 |
| Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow, C&T, Poor | 63 | 73 | 80 | 83 |
| Close-seeded or broadcast legumes or rotation meadow, C&T, Good | 51 | 67 | 76 | 80 |
Table 2-2c: Runoff curve numbers for other agricultural lands (14 rows)
| Cover | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pasture, grassland, or range - continuous forage for grazing, Poor | 68 | 79 | 86 | 89 |
| Pasture, grassland, or range - continuous forage for grazing, Fair | 49 | 69 | 79 | 84 |
| Pasture, grassland, or range - continuous forage for grazing, Good | 39 | 61 | 74 | 80 |
| Meadow - continuous grass, protected from grazing and generally mowed for hay | 30 | 58 | 71 | 78 |
| Brush - brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the major element, Poor | 48 | 67 | 77 | 83 |
| Brush - brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the major element, Fair | 35 | 56 | 70 | 77 |
| Brush - brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the major element, Good | 30 | 48 | 65 | 73 |
| Woods - grass combination (orchard or tree farm), Poor | 57 | 73 | 82 | 86 |
| Woods - grass combination (orchard or tree farm), Fair | 43 | 65 | 76 | 82 |
| Woods - grass combination (orchard or tree farm), Good | 32 | 58 | 72 | 79 |
| Woods, Poor | 45 | 66 | 77 | 83 |
| Woods, Fair | 36 | 60 | 73 | 79 |
| Woods, Good | 30 | 55 | 70 | 77 |
| Farmsteads - buildings, lanes, driveways, and surrounding lots | 59 | 74 | 82 | 86 |
Table 2-2d: Runoff curve numbers for arid and semiarid rangelands (15 rows)
| Cover | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbaceous - mixture of grass, weeds, and low-growing brush, with brush the minor element, Poor | — | 80 | 87 | 93 |
| Herbaceous - mixture of grass, weeds, and low-growing brush, with brush the minor element, Fair | — | 71 | 81 | 89 |
| Herbaceous - mixture of grass, weeds, and low-growing brush, with brush the minor element, Good | — | 62 | 74 | 85 |
| Oak-aspen - mountain brush mixture of oak brush, aspen, mountain mahogany, bitter brush, maple, and other brush, Poor | — | 66 | 74 | 79 |
| Oak-aspen - mountain brush mixture of oak brush, aspen, mountain mahogany, bitter brush, maple, and other brush, Fair | — | 48 | 57 | 63 |
| Oak-aspen - mountain brush mixture of oak brush, aspen, mountain mahogany, bitter brush, maple, and other brush, Good | — | 30 | 41 | 48 |
| Pinyon-juniper - pinyon, juniper, or both; grass understory, Poor | — | 75 | 85 | 89 |
| Pinyon-juniper - pinyon, juniper, or both; grass understory, Fair | — | 58 | 73 | 80 |
| Pinyon-juniper - pinyon, juniper, or both; grass understory, Good | — | 41 | 61 | 71 |
| Sagebrush with grass understory, Poor | — | 67 | 80 | 85 |
| Sagebrush with grass understory, Fair | — | 51 | 63 | 70 |
| Sagebrush with grass understory, Good | — | 35 | 47 | 55 |
| Desert shrub - major plants include saltbush, greasewood, creosotebush, blackbrush, bursage, palo verde, mesquite, and cactus, Poor | 63 | 77 | 85 | 88 |
| Desert shrub - major plants include saltbush, greasewood, creosotebush, blackbrush, bursage, palo verde, mesquite, and cactus, Fair | 55 | 72 | 81 | 86 |
| Desert shrub - major plants include saltbush, greasewood, creosotebush, blackbrush, bursage, palo verde, mesquite, and cactus, Good | 49 | 68 | 79 | 84 |
Worked example
The default inputs above are a published example: 1.5 ac paved parking and 2.5 ac lawn in good condition on HSG C (TR-55 Table 2-2a), at the 10-yr 24-hr depth of the DM2024 Ch. 7 example site (Table 7.1, 3.74 in).
- CN = (98 × 1.50 ac + 74 × 2.50 ac) / 4.00 ac = 83.0
- S = 1000 / 83.0 − 10 = 2.05 in
- Ia = 0.2 × S = 0.41 in
- Q = (3.74 − 0.41)² / (3.74 − 0.41 + 2.05) = 2.06 in
The formula
Q = (P − 0.2S)² / (P + 0.8S), S = 1000/CN − 10, for P > 0.2S
TR-55 (1986) eq. 2-3 and 2-4, p. 2-1
- Q
- direct runoff depth, in
- P
- rainfall depth for the 24-hr storm, in
- S
- potential maximum retention after runoff begins, in
- Ia
- initial abstraction, all losses before runoff begins (0.2S), in
- CN
- runoff curve number, from cover type and hydrologic soil group
Area-weighted CN or runoff-weighted Q
TR-55 Worksheet 2, WinTR-55 and WinTR-20 weight the curve number by area, and that is what a reviewer reproduces. NEH 630 Chapter 10 says weighting runoff is more exact where the curve numbers in one drainage area differ a lot, because a weighted CN under- or over-estimates Q depending on the storm. Pick the method your reviewer expects; both run through the same equation.
When the CN method stops working
TR-55 calls the procedure less accurate when runoff is under 0.5 in, says to use another procedure when the weighted CN is under 40, and does not cover snowmelt or rain on frozen ground (TR-55 p. 2-11). The calculator says so beside the answer when a run crosses one of those lines.
Questions about this calculation
- What is the SCS runoff equation?
- Q = (P − 0.2S)² / (P + 0.8S) with S = 1000/CN − 10, valid when P is greater than 0.2S. Below that, Q is zero.
- TR-55 (1986) eq. 2-3 and 2-4, p. 2-1
- What CN does a paved parking lot take?
- 98 on every hydrologic soil group.
- TR-55 Table 2-2a, p. 2-5
- What CN does lawn in good condition take on C soil?
- 74, for open space with grass cover over 75%.
- TR-55 Table 2-2a, p. 2-5
- Can I use Ia = 0.05S?
- Not with the TR-55 curve number tables. TR-55 and NEH 630 both say a ratio other than 0.2 needs a redeveloped set of curve numbers.
- TR-55 p. 2-11; NEH 630 Ch. 10, p. 10-4
- What CN does NYSDEC require for pre-developed farmland?
- Meadow. The design manual takes agricultural land as meadow in the pre-development condition.
- NYS Stormwater Management Design Manual (July 31, 2024) § 4.6
- How much runoff does 6 in of rain give at CN 75?
- 3.28 in, TR-55's own worked example.
- TR-55 Example 2-2, Fig. 2-6, p. 2-14
The other calculators
- Time of concentration. TR-55 Tc from a sheet flow, a shallow concentrated flow and a channel flow segment, in hours and minutes.
- Rational method peak flow. Peak runoff Q = Cf·C·i·A from the runoff coefficient, rainfall intensity and drainage area, with the frequency factor for the storm.
- Detention volume estimate. Storage needed to hold post-development runoff to an allowable release rate, by the modified rational critical-duration method.
- NY water quality volume. WQv = P·Rv·A/12 from the 90th percentile rainfall, impervious cover and contributing area, per the NYSDEC design manual.
The full app runs the whole site: Atlas 14 rainfall frozen for the project, pre and post hydrographs, and the pond routed through its outlets. Then the NYSDEC checks you select, and a PDF report with the SWMM file a reviewer can rerun.
14-day trial, every feature, no card.